مشاركات عشوائية

What's worse than a recession? A recession with tax hikes

featured image

Lawmakers are facing demands from the business community to roll back the provisions, which will grow stronger if the economy continues to weaken. The prospect of Washington doing anything about them or anything else to help growth, however, seems dim, with Congress under divided control and House Republicans barely showing unity at first.

“This is a particularly difficult moment in time,” said Chris Netram, senior vice president for tax at the National Association of Manufacturers. “If you add tax increases to a slowing economy, what does that do for businesses? It puts our guys in a bind.

This is the exact opposite of what usually happens when the bad times hit. Normally, lawmakers look to the tax system to help cushion the blow for individuals and employers, finding ways to cut taxes. In the initial wake of the coronavirus pandemic, lawmakers sent checks to millions of Americans, among other changes, while making it easier for businesses to qualify for refunds.

Business advocates had hoped lawmakers would turn off at least some of the hikes during last month’s lame duck session of Congress, though that fell apart amid a partisan dispute over Democrats’ demands to extend as well. child tax credit.

This all stems from the fact that many, but not all, economists believe a recession is approaching thanks to the Federal Reserve’s efforts to fight inflation with a series of sharp interest rate hikes.

A pair of new tax increases kicked off last week, including a minimum tax on large corporations. This is a particularly complicated tax, with the Treasury Department only beginning to spell out exactly how it will work, and many companies say they are still trying to determine whether they will be affected by it.

Companies that buy their own shares are also subject to a new excise tax which came into force on January 1. 1. At the same time, a deduction for the purchase of equipment, machinery and other investments automatically decreased by 20% with the new year.

This adds to a pair of other business tax increases – which went live last year – that Republicans used to help defray the cost of their 2017 tax cuts. They were widely considered budget gimmicks and many expected them to be retired by now.

One forces companies to spread a deduction for research and development expenses over five years instead of taking them all at once – which aerospace and defense giant Raytheon would cost it $1.5 billion. dollars.

Another reduction in write-offs companies can take for interest payments on borrowed money, a provision that will sting a bit more in a rising interest rate environment. In certain situations, according to experts, companies may have to pay taxes even if they have no taxable income.

In total, they total $115 billion this year, according to estimates from the Official Joint Committee on Taxation and the nonpartisan Center for Tax Policy — a big change from the amount big corporations usually pay. Last year, corporate taxes totaled $425 billion.

“It’s a huge delta in corporate taxes,” said Donald Schneider, a former Ways and Means Republicans economist who is now deputy director of US policy at Piper Sandler, an investment bank.

Business leaders are still hoping the increases will be reversed this year.

But an impasse among lawmakers has yet to be resolved, with Democrats blocking proposals to cut corporate taxes without also cutting them for average Americans.

And it’s not entirely clear how much House Republicans care about raising taxes on big business.

Although they pushed through a steep corporate rate cut the last time they led the House, many of those lawmakers have since left Congress, the party’s relationship with business has soured in recent years. years and the caucus has taken a populist turn.

This week, they chose Rep. Jason Smith (R-Mo.), an avowed arsonist skeptical of big business, who heads the Ways and Means Committee, which directs tax policy.

In his campaign for the gavel, Smith scoffed at suggestions that he would roll back the Democrats’ new minimum tax on big business, saying it would be his “last” priority.

And in a statement this week after his selection, Smith said that, if at all, he would take a skeptical look at corporate tax breaks, saying he wanted to consider whether lawmakers should “continue to give corporate tax breaks who have lost their American identity in favor of a relationship with China.

Although higher taxes are hurting the economy, some experts are downplaying the implications. With the exception of so-called bonus write-offs, tax increases tend to narrowly target very large corporations, which, at the moment, are not cash-strapped.

“The corporate tax hike itself will be a small headwind to growth this year,” said Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics.

“The economic fallout from higher corporate taxes is mitigated by the still historically low effective corporate tax rate, ample liquidity and significant investment needs due to efforts to improve chain resilience. world and labor productivity,” said Zandi.

Goldman Sachs is in a similar camp.

He sees provisions for amortization of R&D, interest and bonuses raise effective corporate tax rates this year by 1.6 percentage points. This will result in a “small” reduction in the profits of large companies.

“Corporate tax policies taking effect in 2023 are expected to have a small impact on overall S&P 500 earnings, but the impact will vary by sector,” he said in a research note last week.

We estimate that all of these provisions would be lower than 2023 S&P [earnings per share] by three percent.

Post a Comment

0 Comments